All pupils in special schools are required by law to provide for a comprehensive evaluation every three years, eligibility for special education have. The following case study is about a student named "Adam". Adam is seven years old and has autism. It is a special day class setting in a public school. The case study includes details on Adam evaluation of the training of three years.
The student in this case study is autism. His name is Adam. Adam is seven years. It is in a special class for severely handicapped students Day. Assessment of 3 years must be carried out by Adam, to determine their eligibility for special education. Adam has a lawyer and parents who are very active with his studies. The assessment plan was presented to parents, they asked for additional contributions, including a functional analysis, occupational therapy and evaluation of assistive technology. A copy of the signed assessment plan has given the appropriate specialists: psychologists, occupational therapists, speech therapists, speech therapist, nurse and teacher.
The school psychologist noted Adam several times before the administration of the psychoeducational profile revised (PEP-R). The PEP-R includes a variety of fields of development. The test items are presented with simple instructions and practical and most of the expected responses nonverbal. The PEP-R provides information on the operation of the development in imitation, perception, fine motor, gross motor skills, eye-hand integration, cognitive performance and cognitive verbal areas. The PEP-R is presented in a series of toys and learning materials that Adam was in the activities of organized games. The psychologist recorded the reactions of Adam to the test. His results were then divided into seven sectors and four behavioral development. The resulting profile reveals the strengths and weaknesses of Adam in the various fields of development and behavior.
Adam portfolio was used as an assessment tool. Included in his portfolio, samples of work, progress reports, behavior reports, notes from parents and the daily reports. The teacher sent home daily reports that the performance, compliance levels and calls for the roles of Adam and goals and benchmarks included. His parents have signed and sent back daily reports and became a part of their portfolio. The daily reports were used to assist in the evaluation of Adam.
The school psychologist conducted a functional analysis to determine why Adam was with disruptive behavior. It sent questionnaires to the parents home to complete. Screaming and biting behavior is parents and teachers are concerned. The teacher is responsible for the collection of data on the behavior. The psychologist and professor has created a form for collecting data. The teacher showed the presence of undesirable behaviors. Information for parents, teachers and psychologists collected observations of the psychologist and the report was written.
The OT Adam observed, evaluated and provide a report. The nurse Adam tested with a special device. It was found that his hearing appeared normal. Adam's parents reported no problems with his eyesight and hearing. The speech therapist, with him last year he was also evaluated.
Other tests may be used to diagnose and assessment of students with autism are the Autism Behavior Checklist (ABC), Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (ADI-R), Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS) and Autism Diagnostic Observation front-Linguistic Schedule (PL-ADOS). These tests provide individual assessment of autism, specifically designed to assess children with autism. In addition, the analysis of historical information about the child's behavior (usually by a parent were made available), direct observation of the child from a specialist or a combination of these methods.
Review of Adam's assessment of the three years was extended and complete. This evaluation has provided information about the team on the development of Adam, behavior, communication, health, coordination, and cognitive levels are available. With this information, the individual education plan (IEP) team determined that the placement was appropriate. Occupational Therapy (OT) services have been recommended. The occupational therapist wrote a number of objectives and provide services of Adam. The functional analysis to the conclusion that the unwanted behavior occurred when Adam transitions. The evaluation found that assistive technology is characterized Adam. No recommendations were necessary. Although assessment of Adam has been extended and arduous work provided for the IEP team valuable information that helped the team to make recommendations for the education of Adam. The analysis also revealed that Adam was a great improvement in their adaptation of the school day special.
{ 0 comments }